AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 675 MHz
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 768 MB
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 386
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.082 vs 27.222
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.174 vs 40.61
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 12 July 2010 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 336 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 768 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 vs 27.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 vs 40.61 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 907.2 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2263 vs 1418
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7831 vs 7038
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.445 vs 17.26
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 617.847 vs 476.075
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.823 vs 1.653
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3351 vs 1747
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1484
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2449
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3351 vs 1747
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1484
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2449
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 907.2 gflops vs 737.3 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2263 vs 1418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7831 vs 7038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.445 vs 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 vs 476.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.823 vs 1.653 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2449 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1418 | 2263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 386 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7038 | 7831 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 | 21.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 | 617.847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.653 | 1.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 | 27.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 | 40.61 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1484 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2449 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1484 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2449 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Litho | GF104 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 12 July 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 942 | 945 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 960 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | 907.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 23.04 GTexel / s | 37.8 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,950 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |