AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 384 vs 288
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 360
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7038 vs 6340
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.082 vs 24.476
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.174 vs 48.203
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 288 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 360 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7038 vs 6340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 vs 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 vs 48.203 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 31.2 billion / sec vs 23.04 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 748.8 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
- Around 70% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1986 vs 1418
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.62 vs 17.26
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 635.018 vs 476.075
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.755 vs 1.653
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3044 vs 1747
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3491 vs 1484
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3108 vs 2449
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3044 vs 1747
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3491 vs 1484
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3108 vs 2449
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion / sec vs 23.04 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops vs 737.3 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1986 vs 1418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.62 vs 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 635.018 vs 476.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 vs 1.653 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3044 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3491 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3108 vs 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3044 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3491 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3108 vs 2449 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1418 | 1986 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 360 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7038 | 6340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 | 18.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 | 635.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.653 | 1.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 | 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 | 48.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1484 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2449 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1484 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2449 | 3108 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Litho | GF104 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 15 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 942 | 944 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 960 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 23.04 GTexel / s | 31.2 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 104 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |