AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M370

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 620 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 314
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7038 vs 6362
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.174 vs 59.007

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

• Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 39.7 billion / sec vs 23.04 GTexel / s
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1928 vs 1418
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.12 vs 17.26
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 664.78 vs 476.075
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.003 vs 1.653
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.983 vs 30.082
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2649 vs 1747
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1484
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 2449
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2649 vs 1747
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1484
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 2449

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1418 1928
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	676 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7038 6362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.26 22.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476.075 664.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.653 2.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.082 33.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.174 59.007
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 2649
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1484 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2449 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 2649
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1484 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2449 3347

Compare specifications (specs)