AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 M370
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 M370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 960 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 52 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,664 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1635 vs 1418
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10239 vs 6978
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.977 vs 17.26
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.177 vs 1.653
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.847 vs 30.082
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 167.399 vs 70.174
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2315 vs 1747
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3162 vs 1484
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2449
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2315 vs 1747
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3162 vs 1484
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2449
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops vs 737.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1635 vs 1418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10239 vs 6978 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 vs 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 vs 1.653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 vs 30.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 vs 70.174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 2449 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M370
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 375
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 vs 309.874
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 vs 309.874 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 M370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1635 | 1418 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10239 | 6978 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | 476.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | 1.653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | 30.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | 70.174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 2449 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Raven | Litho |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 947 | 948 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 960 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s | 23.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |