AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M365DX and ATI Radeon 9200 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 vs 129
- 215.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 647 vs 3
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 vs 1 March 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 vs 129 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 647 vs 3 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 SE
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | ATI Radeon 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5601 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1229 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1229 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1370 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1370 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2017 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2017 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 | 129 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 647 | 3 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | ATI Radeon 9200 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Rage 7 |
| Code name | Meso | RV280 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 | 1 March 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1268 | 1265 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 36 million |
| Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | AGP 8x |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 128 + 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.656 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 332 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R8 M365DX with others
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
ATIRadeon 9200 SE
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3
