AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M365DX and AMD Radeon R7 M260DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 940 MHz
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1229 vs 1047
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1229 vs 1047
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1370 vs 1019
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1370 vs 1019
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 197 vs 195
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 June 2015 vs 12 October 2014
Boost clock speed 1125 MHz vs 940 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1229 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1229 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1370 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1370 vs 1019
PassMark - G2D Mark 197 vs 195

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 5601
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2165 vs 2017
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2165 vs 2017
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 817 vs 602
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 18010 vs 5601
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2165 vs 2017
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2165 vs 2017
PassMark - G3D Mark 817 vs 602

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5601
18010
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1229
1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1229
1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1370
1019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1370
1019
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2017
2165
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2017
2165
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
197
195
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
602
817
Name AMD Radeon R8 M365DX AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
Geekbench - OpenCL 5601 18010
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1229 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1229 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1370 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1370 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2017 2165
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2017 2165
PassMark - G2D Mark 197 195
PassMark - G3D Mark 602 817

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R8 M365DX AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Meso Topaz
Launch date 3 June 2015 12 October 2014
Place in performance rating 1266 1267
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1125 MHz 940 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768
Transistor count 3,100 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP IGP
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 128 + 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0