AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M365DX and AMD Radeon R7 M260DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 940 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1229 vs 1047
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1229 vs 1047
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1370 vs 1019
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1370 vs 1019
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 197 vs 195
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2015 vs 12 October 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1229 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1229 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1370 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1370 vs 1019 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 vs 195 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 5601
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2165 vs 2017
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2165 vs 2017
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 817 vs 602
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 vs 5601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 vs 2017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 vs 2017 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 vs 602 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5601 | 18010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1229 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1229 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1370 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1370 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2017 | 2165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2017 | 2165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 | 195 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 602 | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Meso | Topaz |
Launch date | 3 June 2015 | 12 October 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1266 | 1267 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 940 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 + 64 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 |