AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics P4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

Intel HD Graphics P4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 38% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 650 MHz
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1420 vs 516
38x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40722 vs 1071
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3168 vs 2225
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3168 vs 2225
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2461
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2461

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 December 2013 vs 14 May 2012
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 650 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1420 vs 516
Geekbench - OpenCL	40722 vs 1071
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3168 vs 2225
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3168 vs 2225
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 2461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 2461

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000

Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 930 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 388

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	636 vs 388

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

388

636

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1420

516

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

40722

1071

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3168

2225

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3168

2225

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

2461

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

2461

Name	AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM	Intel HD Graphics P4000
PassMark - G2D Mark	388	636
PassMark - G3D Mark	1420	516
Geekbench - OpenCL	40722	1071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3168	2225
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3168	2225
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	2461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	2461

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM	Intel HD Graphics P4000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 7.0
Code name	Cape Verde	Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date	21 December 2013	14 May 2012
Place in performance rating	612	613
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	930 MHz	1250 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	952.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	512
Texture fill rate	29.76 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.0
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	73.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5