AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics P4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 38% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1420 vs 516
  • 38x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40722 vs 1071
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3168 vs 2225
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3168 vs 2225
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2461
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2461
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 14 May 2012
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 650 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1420 vs 516
Geekbench - OpenCL 40722 vs 1071
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3168 vs 2225
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3168 vs 2225
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 2461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 2461

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000

  • Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 388
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1250 MHz vs 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 636 vs 388

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
388
636
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1420
516
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
40722
1071
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3168
2225
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3168
2225
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
2461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
2461
Name AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM Intel HD Graphics P4000
PassMark - G2D Mark 388 636
PassMark - G3D Mark 1420 516
Geekbench - OpenCL 40722 1071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3168 2225
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3168 2225
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 2461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 2461

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM Intel HD Graphics P4000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Generation 7.0
Code name Cape Verde Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date 21 December 2013 14 May 2012
Place in performance rating 612 614
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 930 MHz 1250 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 512
Texture fill rate 29.76 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 1,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5