AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 15.7x more texture fill rate: 29.76 GTexel / s vs 1.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 74 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 274
- 24.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1420 vs 59
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 23 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s vs 1.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 74 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 vs 274 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1420 vs 59 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 274 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1420 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Cape Verde | NV38 A1 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 23 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 612 | 609 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s | 1.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 74 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x Molex |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 30.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |