AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 736 MHz
  • Around 78% higher pipelines: 512 vs 288
  • Around 12% better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 3828 MHz
  • Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40722 vs 27378
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3112 vs 2879
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3112 vs 2879
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3322
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3322
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 14 May 2011
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 736 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 288
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz vs 3828 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 40722 vs 27378
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3112 vs 2879
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3112 vs 2879
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3322

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

  • Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 35.3 GTexel / s vs 29.76 GTexel / s
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 447 vs 394
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1572 vs 1457
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3372 vs 3168
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3372 vs 3168
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 35.3 GTexel / s vs 29.76 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 447 vs 394
PassMark - G3D Mark 1572 vs 1457
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3372 vs 3168
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3372 vs 3168

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
394
447
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1457
1572
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
40722
27378
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3112
2879
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3112
2879
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3168
3372
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3168
3372
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3322
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3322
Name AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark 394 447
PassMark - G3D Mark 1457 1572
Geekbench - OpenCL 40722 27378
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3112 2879
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3112 2879
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3168 3372
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3168 3372
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3322

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Cape Verde GF114
Launch date 21 December 2013 14 May 2011
Place in performance rating 599 600
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 930 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 736 MHz
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops 847.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 512 288
Texture fill rate 29.76 GTexel / s 35.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 2x 6-pin
Length 210 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB / s 91.9 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz 3828 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5