AMD Radeon R9 270 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270 and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 700 MHz
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 74 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• Around 78% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 720
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,368 gflops vs 1,008.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 vs 1168
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 vs 338
• 71.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 1039
• 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.721 vs 7.384
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 vs 460.31
• 8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 vs 0.679
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 vs 23.118
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 261.843 vs 53.346
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3448 vs 2124
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 1757
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3448 vs 2124
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 1757

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750

• Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 150 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4306 1168
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	567 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	74175 1039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.721 7.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1282.039 460.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.927 0.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	93.116 23.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	261.843 53.346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3448 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3448 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3347

Compare specifications (specs)