AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 290X and AMD Radeon HD 7750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 9.6x more texture fill rate: 176.0 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- 5.5x more pipelines: 2816 vs 512
- 9.6x better floating-point performance: 5,632 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8567 vs 1191
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 757 vs 693
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3551
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 October 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 176.0 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8567 vs 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 757 vs 693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 vs 3551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 vs 3551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750M
- 8.9x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 290X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 290X | AMD Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8567 | 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 757 | 693 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43410 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 117.322 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.12 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 628.757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 | 3551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 | 3551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3932 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 290X | AMD Radeon HD 7750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Hawaii | Chelsea |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 24 October 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
| Place in performance rating | 289 | 290 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 947 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2816 | 512 |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Texture fill rate | 176.0 GTexel / s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 275 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 290X with others
AMDRadeon R9 290X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
AMDRadeon R9 290X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 290X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
AMDRadeon R9 290X vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
AMDRadeon R9 290X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon R9 290X vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
