AMD Radeon R9 350 vs Intel HD Graphics P4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 9.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9870 vs 1071
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 2225
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 2225
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 2461
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 2461
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 2461 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 | 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 2461 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 516 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 350 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tobago | Generation 7.0 |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 610 | 613 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |