AMD Radeon R9 350 vs AMD Radeon R7 350
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and AMD Radeon R7 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9926 vs 7787
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2609 vs 2072
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2609 vs 2072
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 3122
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 3122
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 3358
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 vs 7787 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 vs 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 vs 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 vs 12 June 2015 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | AMD Radeon R7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 7787 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | AMD Radeon R7 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | GCN 1.0 |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 6 July 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 585 | 1083 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Code name | Cape Verde | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
