AMD Radeon R9 350 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 2070
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 2070
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 1514
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 1514
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 1514 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 24% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19490 vs 9926
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 2609
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 2609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 12 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19490 vs 9926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 vs 2609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 19490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 6318 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 6318 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 1514 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3880 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | GCN 4.0 |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 1 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 585 | 589 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Code name | Polaris 22 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 204.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
