AMD Radeon R9 350 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 2673
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 2673
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 2799
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 2799
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 13 October 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 108 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 2673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 2673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 2799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 2799 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 9926
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 vs 2609
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 vs 2609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 768 |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10495 vs 9926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2636 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2636 vs 2609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 10495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 2636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 2636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 2673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 2673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 2799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 2799 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1345 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.373 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 459.025 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.906 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.022 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.793 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | TeraScale 2 |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 13 October 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 585 | 1094 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Code name | Juniper | |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 208 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
