AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9926 vs 2902
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2609 vs 1951
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2609 vs 1951
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 1693
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 1693
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 3324
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 3324
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 18 June 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 vs 2902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 3324 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 2902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 3324 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | Fermi |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 18 June 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 585 | 1311 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Code name | GF108 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
| Price now | $54.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
