AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 3579
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 3579
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 3358
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 3358
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19914 vs 9926
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 2609
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 2609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 12 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 vs 9926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 vs 2609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 19914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 8059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 8059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | Pascal |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 3 January 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 585 | 505 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Code name | GP107 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1152 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
