AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9926 vs 6869
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 2490
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 2490
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 3329
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 3329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 vs 6869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2609
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 6869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 3329 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | Maxwell |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 585 | 953 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Code name | GM107 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
| Price now | $189.93 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | 4 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
