AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9926 vs 3053
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 2875
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 2875
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 3328
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 3328
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 vs 3053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 3328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 2609
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 2609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 12 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 vs 2609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 3053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 3328 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | Pascal |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 585 | 983 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Code name | GP107 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1228 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 256 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 32.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 4012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
