AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 36x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 89.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 34
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 258
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 17 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 vs 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 258 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 | 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 258 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Tobago | NV35 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 17 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 662 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | 1.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | 17.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | 550 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |