AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 250X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 38 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 33% better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 1,216 gflops
• 4x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 1625 MHz
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 2269
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.283 vs 32.22
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 815.354 vs 638.532
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.437 vs 2.963
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.718 vs 51.987
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.258 vs 151.963
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4468 vs 3916
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4468 vs 3916

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X

• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 85 Watt
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 460
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3667
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3667
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3032 2269
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	460 637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.283 32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	815.354 638.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.437 2.963
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.718 51.987
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.258 151.963
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4468 3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4468 3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3358

Compare specifications (specs)