AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
5x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
12.4x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 130.56 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
9.8x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 666 MHz
12.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 251
Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 249

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 3 September 2010
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate	50.4 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 48
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops vs 130.56 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	6500 MHz vs 666 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3032 vs 251
PassMark - G2D Mark	460 vs 249

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

2.7x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 85 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	32 Watt vs 85 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3032

251

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

460

249

Name	AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	3032	251
PassMark - G2D Mark	460	249
Geekbench - OpenCL	14269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	171.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Tobago	GT216
Launch date	5 May 2015	3 September 2010
Place in performance rating	665	668
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	625 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops	130.56 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	48
Texture fill rate	50.4 GTexel / s	10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	32 Watt
Transistor count	2,080 million	486 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	165 mm	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	104.0 GB / s	10.66 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6500 MHz	666 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3