AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
2.4x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 200 Watt
Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 5000 MHz

Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 7 March 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 200 Watt
Memory clock speed	6500 MHz vs 5000 MHz

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
Around 78% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.802 vs 39.283
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.769 vs 815.354
Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.68 vs 63.718
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 370.179 vs 171.258

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	89.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 768
Floating-point performance	2,867 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
Maximum memory size	3 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.802 vs 39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1230.769 vs 815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	81.68 vs 63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	370.179 vs 171.258

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

39.283

67.802

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

815.354

1230.769

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

63.718

81.68

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

171.258

370.179

Name	AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM	AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark	3032
PassMark - G2D Mark	460
Geekbench - OpenCL	14269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	39.283	67.802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	815.354	1230.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	63.718	81.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	171.258	370.179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM	AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Tobago	Tahiti
Launch date	5 May 2015	7 March 2013
Place in performance rating	665	667
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$449
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	800 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops	2,867 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	1792
Texture fill rate	50.4 GTexel / s	89.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	200 Watt
Transistor count	2,080 million	4,313 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	165 mm	279 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	104.0 GB / s	240.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6500 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5