AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 200 Watt
  • Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 7 March 2013
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 200 Watt
Memory clock speed 6500 MHz vs 5000 MHz

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

  • Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
  • Around 78% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.802 vs 39.283
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.769 vs 815.354
  • Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.68 vs 63.718
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 370.179 vs 171.258
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 89.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1792 vs 768
Floating-point performance 2,867 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.802 vs 39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1230.769 vs 815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.68 vs 63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 370.179 vs 171.258

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
39.283
67.802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
815.354
1230.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
63.718
81.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
171.258
370.179
Name AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark 3032
PassMark - G2D Mark 460
Geekbench - OpenCL 14269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 39.283 67.802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 815.354 1230.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 63.718 81.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 171.258 370.179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Tobago Tahiti
Launch date 5 May 2015 7 March 2013
Place in performance rating 663 666
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $449

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 800 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,613 gflops 2,867 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1792
Texture fill rate 50.4 GTexel / s 89.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 2,080 million 4,313 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 165 mm 279 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 104.0 GB / s 240.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 6500 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5