AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 941 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 27 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 180 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce 825M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 784 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 261 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | GK208 |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 27 January 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 515 | 758 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 941 MHz |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | 30.11 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1300 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |