AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 1,825 gflops
- 933.3x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 vs 16712
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 60.473
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 vs 758.865
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 4.279
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 29.738
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 231.508
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 6803
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 6803
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 1,825 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 vs 16712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 vs 60.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 vs 758.865 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 vs 4.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 vs 29.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 231.508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3697 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 180 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 | 16712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 60.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 758.865 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 4.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 29.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 231.508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5336 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Trinidad | GM206 |
| Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 20 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $159 |
| Place in performance rating | 553 | 540 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $194.44 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | 1,825 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | 49.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,940 million |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 7.938" (20.2 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 105.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 6.6 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 370X with others
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAP104-100
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
