AMD Radeon R9 370X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Environ 67% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 82.4 GTexel / s versus 49.2 billion / sec
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 768
- Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,637 gflops versus 1,825 gflops
- 933.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 6.6 GB/s
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 versus 16712
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 versus 60.473
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 versus 758.865
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 versus 4.279
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 versus 29.738
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 231.508
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 6803
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 6803
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s versus 49.2 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops versus 1,825 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 6.6 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 versus 16712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 versus 60.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 versus 758.865 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 versus 4.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 versus 29.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 231.508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3697 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1024 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1188 MHz versus 1030 MHz
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 90 Watt versus 180 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1024 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1188 MHz versus 1030 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3348 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 | 16712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 60.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 758.865 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 4.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 29.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 231.508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5336 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1862 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Trinidad | GM206 |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 | 20 August 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $159 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 553 | 540 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $194.44 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops | 1,825 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s | 49.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 2,940 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 7.938" (20.2 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 2x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | 105.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | 6.6 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 370X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAP104-100
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
