AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA Quadro 5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon R9 370X

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
2.4x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 405 MHz
5.1x more texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 16.2 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 1280 vs 320
5.1x better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1792 MB
2.3x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 2400 MHz

Launch date	27 August 2015 vs 27 July 2010
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 405 MHz
Texture fill rate	82.4 GTexel / s vs 16.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1280 vs 320
Floating-point performance	2,637 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1792 MB
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz vs 2400 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 180 Watt
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5249 vs 3704
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7205 vs 3348
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5249 vs 3704
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7205 vs 3348

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 180 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	5249 vs 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7205 vs 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	5249 vs 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7205 vs 3348

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3704

5249

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3348

7205

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3704

5249

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3348

7205

Name	AMD Radeon R9 370X	NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	65.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1139.703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.39
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	88.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	337.583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8393
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3704	5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3348	7205
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8393
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3704	5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3348	7205
PassMark - G3D Mark		2060
PassMark - G2D Mark		426
Geekbench - OpenCL		23008

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 370X	NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Trinidad	GF100
Launch date	27 August 2015	27 July 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	516	414
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz
Core clock speed	980 MHz	405 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,637 gflops	518.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1280	320
Texture fill rate	82.4 GTexel / s	16.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	2,800 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	221 mm
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1792 MB
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB / s	76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
ECC (Error Correcting Code)