AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X

  • Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1,024
  • Around 23% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
  • Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 4.91
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 70.779
  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 252.607
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 7467
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 7467
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 82.4 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 1,024
Floating-point performance 2,637 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
Memory clock speed 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.39 vs 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 88.44 vs 70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 337.583 vs 252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8393 vs 7467
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8393 vs 7467

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 vs 65.071
  • Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 vs 1139.703
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 82.563 vs 65.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1266.506 vs 1139.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 vs 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 vs 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3348

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
65.071
82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1139.703
1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.39
4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
88.44
70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337.583
252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8393
7467
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3704
3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3348
3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8393
7467
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3704
3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3348
3360
Name AMD Radeon R9 370X NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 65.071 82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1139.703 1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.39 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 88.44 70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 337.583 252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8393 7467
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3704 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3348 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8393 7467
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3704 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3348 3360
PassMark - G3D Mark 5222
PassMark - G2D Mark 556
Geekbench - OpenCL 15980

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 370X NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Trinidad GM204
Launch date 27 August 2015 18 August 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $199
Place in performance rating 289 270
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz
Core clock speed 980 MHz 1050 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,637 gflops 2,150 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1280 1,024
Texture fill rate 82.4 GTexel / s 67.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 180 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 2,800 million 5,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 221 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 179.2 GB / s 160 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5600 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus