AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon R9 370X

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X

Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1,024
Around 23% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 4.91
Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 70.779
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 252.607
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 7779
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 7779

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	82.4 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1280 vs 1,024
Floating-point performance	2,637 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.39 vs 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	88.44 vs 70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	337.583 vs 252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8393 vs 7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8393 vs 7779

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 vs 65.071
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 vs 1139.703

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 180 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	82.563 vs 65.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1266.506 vs 1139.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3348

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

65.071

82.563

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1139.703

1266.506

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.39

4.91

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

88.44

70.779

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

337.583

252.607

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8393

7779

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3704

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3348

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8393

7779

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3704

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3348

3360

Name	AMD Radeon R9 370X	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	65.071	82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1139.703	1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.39	4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	88.44	70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	337.583	252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8393	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3704	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3348	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8393	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3704	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3348	3360
PassMark - G3D Mark		5526
PassMark - G2D Mark		402
Geekbench - OpenCL		16049

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 370X	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Trinidad	GM204
Launch date	27 August 2015	18 August 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	516	495
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz
Core clock speed	980 MHz	1050 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,637 gflops	2,150 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	1,024
Texture fill rate	82.4 GTexel / s	67.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	2,800 million	5,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	221 mm
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB / s	160 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus