AMD Radeon R9 370X versus NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Environ 23% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 82.4 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 1,024
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,637 gflops versus 2,150 gflops
- Environ 12% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 versus 4.91
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 versus 70.779
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 252.607
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 7779
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 7779
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 1,024 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops versus 2,150 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 versus 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 versus 70.779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 252.607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 7779 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 7779 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 980 MHz
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 versus 65.071
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 versus 1139.703
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 versus 65.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 versus 1139.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3348 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 82.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 1266.506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 70.779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 252.607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 7779 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 7779 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3360 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5526 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16049 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Trinidad | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 | 18 August 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 516 | 495 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1,024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 221 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | None |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |