AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA Tesla K80m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 876 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 64.435
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 75.764
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 198.978
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 17 November 2014 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 vs 64.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 vs 75.764 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 198.978 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- 26.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 82.4 GTexel / s
- 3.9x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 1280
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 2,637 gflops
- 12x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1476.444 vs 1139.703
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.289 vs 5.39
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 82.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops vs 2,637 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1476.444 vs 1139.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.289 vs 5.39 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA Tesla K80m |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 64.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 1476.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 6.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 75.764 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 198.978 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | GK210 |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 17 November 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 516 | 805 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 876 MHz |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 562 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | 2x 4,373 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2x 2496 |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 2x 240.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |