AMD Radeon R9 380 vs AMD FirePro W8100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380 and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 34705
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7635 vs 5494
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3699
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7635 vs 5494
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 23 June 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 vs 34705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 vs 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 vs 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 131.8 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 4,219 gflops vs 3,476 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7333 vs 6108
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 727 vs 653
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.339 vs 58.135
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2333.922 vs 1503.633
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops vs 3,476 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7333 vs 6108 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 vs 653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 vs 58.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 vs 1503.633 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 380 | AMD FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6108 | 7333 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 | 727 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 | 34705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | 93.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | 2333.922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 | 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 | 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 380 | AMD FirePro W8100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Antigua | Hawaii |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 23 June 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 388 | 389 |
| Price now | $264.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,476 gflops | 4,219 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.6 GTexel / s | 131.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 6,200 million |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | Full Height / Full Length |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 279 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 380 with others
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
ATIRadeon X1800 GTO²
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GX2
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 XT
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDFirePro W8100
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q
