AMD Radeon R9 380X vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 124.2 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 3,973 gflops vs 3,625 gflops
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 667 vs 371
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 vs 9390
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops vs 3,625 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6284 vs 6224
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 190 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6284 vs 6224 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6224 | 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 | 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Antigua | GM204 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Place in performance rating | 313 | 356 |
| Price now | $528.44 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s | 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 380X with others
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
