AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 390 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R9 390

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 160.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
Around 90% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1344
Around 94% better floating-point performance: 5,120 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8881 vs 5427
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 vs 694
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10445 vs 8276
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3627
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10445 vs 8276
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3627

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 June 2015 vs 25 August 2013
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
Texture fill rate	160.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2560 vs 1344
Floating-point performance	5,120 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8881 vs 5427
PassMark - G2D Mark	792 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10445 vs 8276
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708 vs 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10445 vs 8276
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708 vs 3627

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 275 Watt
6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1000 MHz

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	170 Watt vs 275 Watt
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8881

5427

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

792

694

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10445

8276

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3627

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10445

8276

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3627

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3354

Name	AMD Radeon R9 390	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark	8881	5427
PassMark - G2D Mark	792	694
Geekbench - OpenCL	43795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3164.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	116.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	607.381
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10445	8276
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10445	8276
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	956

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 390	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Code name	Grenada	GK104
Design	AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date	18 June 2015	25 August 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$329
Place in performance rating	317	320
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	980 MHz
Compute units	40
Floating-point performance	5,120 gflops	2,634 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2560	1344
Stream Processors	2560
Texture fill rate	160.0 GTexel / s	109.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	275 Watt	170 Watt
Transistor count	6,200 million	3,540 million
Core clock speed		915 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays	6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	275 mm	241 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin	2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	384 GB/s	192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	512 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore