AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 390 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 142.9x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43823 vs 42988
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 vs 1722.98
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.473 vs 37.16
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43823 vs 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 vs 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 vs 37.16 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3338 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 160.0 GTexel / s
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 5,120 gflops
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13805 vs 8905
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 795
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 120.267
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 11.097
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 607.381
- Around 46% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5754 vs 3949
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec vs 160.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2560 |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops vs 5,120 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13805 vs 8905 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 vs 120.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 vs 11.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 vs 607.381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 vs 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 vs 10445 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5754 vs 3949 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 | 13805 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 853 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43823 | 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 | 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 | 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 | 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 | 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3949 | 5754 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Grenada | GM200 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $649 |
Place in performance rating | 307 | 306 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $679.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops | 6,060 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2816 |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 160.0 GTexel / s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 8,000 million |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |