AMD Radeon R9 390 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 390 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R9 390

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390

Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
142.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 43803 versus 42931
Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 versus 1722.98
3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.473 versus 37.16

Caractéristiques
Taille de mémore maximale	8 GB versus 6 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	1000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL	43803 versus 42931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3164.164 versus 1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	116.473 versus 37.16
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 versus 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 versus 3338

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1075 MHz versus 1000 MHz
Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 176 billion / sec versus 160.0 GTexel / s
Environ 10% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2560
Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,060 gflops versus 5,120 gflops
Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 275 Watt
Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13809 versus 8910
Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 versus 797
Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 120.267
Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 versus 11.097
Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 versus 607.381
Environ 46% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5754 versus 3949

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	1075 MHz versus 1000 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	176 billion / sec versus 160.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2816 versus 2560
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops versus 5,120 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt versus 275 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	13809 versus 8910
PassMark - G2D Mark	852 versus 797
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843 versus 120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661 versus 11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464 versus 607.381
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471 versus 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471 versus 10445
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5754 versus 3949

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8910

13809

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

797

852

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

43803

42931

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

120.267

145.843

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3164.164

1722.98

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.097

11.661

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

116.473

37.16

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

607.381

788.464

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10445

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3338

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10445

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3338

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3949

5754

Nom	AMD Radeon R9 390	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	8910	13809
PassMark - G2D Mark	797	852
Geekbench - OpenCL	43803	42931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	120.267	145.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3164.164	1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.097	11.661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	116.473	37.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	607.381	788.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10445	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10445	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3949	5754

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon R9 390	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Nom de code	Grenada	GM200
Conception	AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Date de sortie	18 June 2015	2 June 2015
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$329	$649
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	307	306
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Prix maintenant		$679.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		23.43
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1000 MHz	1075 MHz
Unités de Compute	40
Performance á point flottant	5,120 gflops	6,060 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2560	2816
Stream Processors	2560
Taux de remplissage de la texture	160.0 GTexel / s	176 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	275 Watt	250 Watt
Compte de transistor	6,200 million	8,000 million
Vitesse du noyau		1000 MHz
Noyaux CUDA		2816
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity	6
VGA
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI		Internal
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Résolution VGA maximale		2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Bridgeless CrossFire
Soutien de bus	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	275 mm	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Hauteur		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)		600 Watt
Options SLI		4x
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
Mantle
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM)
RAM maximale	8 GB	6 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	384 GB/s	336.5 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	512 bit	384 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1000 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround