AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 3.8x more texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 3584 vs 896
  • 3.8x better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 1,882 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10116 vs 4551
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10116 vs 4551
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 July 2015 vs 2 September 2013
Texture fill rate 224.0 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3584 vs 896
Floating-point performance 7,168 gflops vs 1,882 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10116 vs 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10116 vs 4551

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM

  • 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • 12x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3717
  • 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3356
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3717
  • 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3356
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 275 Watt
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6886 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 17482 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6886 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 17482 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10116
4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
6886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
17482
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10116
4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
6886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
17482
Name AMD Radeon R9 Fury AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 9556
PassMark - G2D Mark 789
Geekbench - OpenCL 53258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 141.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3600.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 133.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 791.572
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10116 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 6886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 17482
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10116 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 6886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 17482
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4739

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 Fury AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Fiji Bonaire
Design AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch date 10 July 2015 2 September 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $549
Place in performance rating 281 279
Price now $399.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 35.98

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz
Compute units 56
Floating-point performance 7,168 gflops 1,882 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 3584 896
Stream Processors 3584
Texture fill rate 224.0 GTexel / s 58.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 275 Watt 85 Watt
Transistor count 8,900 million 2,080 million
Core clock speed 1050 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors ​2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin
Length 183 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_0)
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 96 GB / s
Memory bus width 4096 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 500 MHz 6000 MHz
Memory type High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)