AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 3584 vs 896
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 1,882 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10116 vs 4551
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10116 vs 4551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2015 vs 2 September 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 1,882 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 vs 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 12x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3717
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3356
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3717
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9556 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.671 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3600.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 791.572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 | 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 6886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 17482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 | 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 6886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 17482 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Fiji | Bonaire |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 10 July 2015 | 2 September 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Place in performance rating | 281 | 279 |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 56 | |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops | 1,882 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 896 |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 2,080 million |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 183 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |