AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2816
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 5,914 gflops
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9571 vs 9412
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 140.274 vs 114.288
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 vs 2911.861
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.082 vs 10.947
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 132.701 vs 118.411
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 789.536 vs 683.568
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4739 vs 4242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2816 |
| Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 5,914 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9571 vs 9412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 vs 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 vs 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 vs 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 vs 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 vs 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 vs 4242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 795
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11675 vs 10116
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11675 vs 10116
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 vs 795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11675 vs 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11675 vs 10116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9571 | 9412 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Fiji | Grenada |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
| Launch date | 10 July 2015 | 18 June 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | $429 |
| Place in performance rating | 291 | 292 |
| Price now | $399.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Compute units | 56 | 44 |
| Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops | 5,914 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2816 |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | 2816 |
| Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 8,900 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | 6 |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 512 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 Fury with others
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDFireStream 9270
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
