AMD Radeon R9 Fury versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Environ 21% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 224.0 GTexel / s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2816
- Environ 21% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 7,168 gflops versus 5,914 gflops
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9571 versus 9412
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 140.274 versus 114.288
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 versus 2911.861
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.082 versus 10.947
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 132.701 versus 118.411
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 789.536 versus 683.568
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4739 versus 4242
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.0 GTexel / s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 2816 |
| Performance á point flottant | 7,168 gflops versus 5,914 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9571 versus 9412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 versus 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 versus 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 versus 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 versus 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 versus 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 versus 4242 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 versus 795
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11675 versus 10116
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11675 versus 10116
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 versus 795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11675 versus 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11675 versus 10116 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9571 | 9412 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Fiji | Grenada |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
| Date de sortie | 10 July 2015 | 18 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | $429 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 291 | 292 |
| Prix maintenant | $399.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 56 | 44 |
| Performance á point flottant | 7,168 gflops | 5,914 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2816 |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | 2816 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.0 GTexel / s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 8,900 million | 6,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | 6 |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 bit | 512 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 500 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 Fury avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDFireStream 9270
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
