AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 17.5x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 2.12 GTexel / s
- 80x more pipelines: 640 vs 8
- 56.9x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 15.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1115 vs 70
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 168
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 vs 15 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 2.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1115 vs 70 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M275 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1115 | 70 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.381 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1717 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M275 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Venus | G98 |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 | 15 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1004 | 1007 |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 2.12 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 210 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-I |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |