AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs AMD Radeon R9 M275

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and AMD Radeon R9 M275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 M360

AMD Radeon R9 M275

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1812 vs 1115
Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 313.463
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1623 vs 1162
Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1717
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1623 vs 1162
Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1717

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 28 January 2014
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1812 vs 1115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	575.773 vs 313.463
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1623 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1623 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 1717

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 396
Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 8083
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 19.479
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.206 vs 1.902
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 34.15
Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.685 vs 87.811

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 396
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231 vs 8083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064 vs 19.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206 vs 1.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381 vs 34.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685 vs 87.811

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1812

1115

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

396

569

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8083

9231

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.479

28.064

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

575.773

313.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.902

2.206

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.15

34.381

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.811

121.685

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1623

1162

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

1717

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1623

1162

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

1717

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M360	AMD Radeon R9 M275
PassMark - G3D Mark	1812	1115
PassMark - G2D Mark	396	569
Geekbench - OpenCL	8083	9231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	19.479	28.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	575.773	313.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.902	2.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.15	34.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	87.811	121.685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1623	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1623	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	1717

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M360	AMD Radeon R9 M275
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Tropo	Venus
Design	AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date	5 May 2015	28 January 2014
Place in performance rating	1002	1005
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Launch price (MSRP)		$799.99
Price now		$699.99
Value for money (0-100)		3.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	925 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	900 MHz	900 MHz
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops	1,184 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	640
Texture fill rate	29.6 GTexel / s	37 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore