AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 M275

NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 27% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 706 MHz

Launch date	28 January 2014 vs 12 November 2012
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 706 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c

4x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
3.9x more pipelines: 2496 vs 640
3x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 vs 9231
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 vs 28.064
4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 313.463
Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 vs 2.206
Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 34.381
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 vs 121.685

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	146.8 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2496 vs 640
Floating-point performance	3,524 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	15597 vs 9231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	39.423 vs 28.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1427.15 vs 313.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.128 vs 2.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	64.383 vs 34.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	179.044 vs 121.685

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9231

15597

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

28.064

39.423

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

313.463

1427.15

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.206

4.128

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.381

64.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.685

179.044

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M275	NVIDIA Tesla K20c
PassMark - G3D Mark	1115
PassMark - G2D Mark	569
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231	15597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064	39.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.463	1427.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206	4.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381	64.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685	179.044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1717

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M275	NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Venus	GK110
Launch date	28 January 2014	12 November 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$799.99	$3,199
Place in performance rating	1004	1005
Price now	$699.99
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	3.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	925 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops	3,524 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	2496
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s	146.8 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	7,080 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		225 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0