AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 657 MHz
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 657 MHz
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 232
• Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 5585
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 15.673
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.187 vs 1.512
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.837 vs 30.422
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.407 vs 53.992
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 2836
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 2836

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 vs 1537
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 283.116
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 vs 1228
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 1705
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 vs 1228
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 1705

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1537 1720
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	307 232
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11041 5585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.109 15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	283.116 509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.187 1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.837 30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.407 53.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3333

Compare specifications (specs)