AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs ATI FirePro M7740
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M290X and ATI FirePro M7740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 72 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,304 gflops vs 832.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3263 vs 665
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 415
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 4 August 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops vs 832.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3263 vs 665 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 vs 415 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7740
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 3384 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2526
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2526
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3384 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2526 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2526 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
GPU 2: ATI FirePro M7740
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | ATI FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3263 | 665 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 415 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23500 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.022 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 936.497 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.62 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.584 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.046 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2526 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2526 | 3309 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M290X | ATI FirePro M7740 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Neptune | M97 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 4 August 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 598 | 600 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | 832.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s | 20.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 54.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 3384 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M290X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
ATIFirePro M7740
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
NVIDIAT1000
