AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs ATI FirePro M7740
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M290X and ATI FirePro M7740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 72 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,304 gflops vs 832.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3256 vs 665
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 415
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 4 August 2009 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops vs 832.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3256 vs 665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 415 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7740
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 3384 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2526
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2526
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3384 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2526 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
GPU 2: ATI FirePro M7740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | ATI FirePro M7740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3256 | 665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | 415 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.022 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 936.497 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.62 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.046 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2526 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2526 | 3309 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X | ATI FirePro M7740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Neptune | M97 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 4 August 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 598 | 601 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | 832.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s | 20.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 54.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 3384 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |