AMD Radeon R9 M295X versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M295X and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
| Date de sortie | 23 November 2014 versus 22 December 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 118.4 GTexel / s versus 92.54 GTexel / s
- Environ 28% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 2,961 gflops
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 versus 26950
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.413 versus 65.777
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 versus 820.138
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 versus 7.142
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 68.754
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 versus 386.418
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 2045
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 3144
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 2045
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 3144
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s versus 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 2,961 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 versus 26950 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.413 versus 65.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1390.592 versus 820.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 versus 7.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 68.754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 versus 386.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 2045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3144 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 2045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3144 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26950 | 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | 84.413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | 1390.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | 7.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | 101.929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 | 481.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2045 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2045 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M295X | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Amethyst | Tahiti |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 23 November 2014 | 22 December 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 499 | 501 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 723 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,961 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.54 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 274 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | Not Listed | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1375 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M295X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 550
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
AMDRadeon R9 Nano
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575
AMDRadeon R9 M295X vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo
