NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5650 vs 5150
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 vs 65.777
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 vs 820.138
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.779 vs 68.754
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2045
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3144
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2045
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3144
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 23 November 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5650 vs 5150 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 vs 65.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 vs 820.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 vs 68.754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3144 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1,024
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 418
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26893 vs 16615
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.142 vs 4.91
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 386.418 vs 252.607
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1,024 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 2,150 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 vs 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26893 vs 16615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 vs 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 vs 252.607 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | AMD Radeon R9 M295X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5650 | 5150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 832 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16615 | 26893 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | 65.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | 820.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | 7.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | 68.754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 | 386.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3144 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 23 November 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 494 | 491 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 723 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |