NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 723 MHz
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5650 vs 5150
  • Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 vs 65.777
  • Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 vs 820.138
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.779 vs 68.754
  • Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2045
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3144
  • Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2045
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3144
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 August 2015 vs 23 November 2014
Core clock speed 1050 MHz vs 723 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5650 vs 5150
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 82.563 vs 65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1266.506 vs 820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 70.779 vs 68.754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3144

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X

  • Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1,024
  • Around 38% better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
  • Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 418
  • Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26893 vs 16615
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.142 vs 4.91
  • Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 386.418 vs 252.607
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 92.54 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2048 vs 1,024
Floating-point performance 2,961 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 832 vs 418
Geekbench - OpenCL 26893 vs 16615
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.142 vs 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 386.418 vs 252.607

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5650
5150
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
418
832
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
16615
26893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
82.563
65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1266.506
820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.91
7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
70.779
68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
252.607
386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3144
Name NVIDIA Quadro M3000M AMD Radeon R9 M295X
PassMark - G3D Mark 5650 5150
PassMark - G2D Mark 418 832
Geekbench - OpenCL 16615 26893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 82.563 65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1266.506 820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.91 7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 70.779 68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 252.607 386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 3144

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 3.0
Code name GM204 Amethyst
Launch date 18 August 2015 23 November 2014
Place in performance rating 494 491
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 1050 MHz 723 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,150 gflops 2,961 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1,024 2048
Texture fill rate 67.2 GTexel / s 92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 5,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12 Not Listed
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160 GB / s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 Not Listed
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore