AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs ATI Radeon X700 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M295X and ATI Radeon X700 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 723 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 57.8x more texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 72.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5150 vs 71
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 348
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 November 2014 vs 1 April 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 vs 71 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 vs 348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X700 SE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | ATI Radeon X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 | 71 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 | 348 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26840 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2045 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2045 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M295X | ATI Radeon X700 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | R400 |
| Code name | Amethyst | RV410 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 23 November 2014 | 1 April 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | 496 | 497 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 120 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | Not Listed | 9.0b |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 4 GB / s |
| Memory type | Not Listed | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
