AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 824 MHz
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 430
• Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8493 vs 5235
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.479 vs 13.806
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 546.51
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 1.535
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 27.524
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 38.664
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 1435
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3300
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 1435
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3300

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 39.55 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 13% higher pipelines: 576 vs 512
• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1877 vs 1833
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 1623
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 1623

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1877
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 430
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8493 5235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.479 13.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	575.773 546.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.902 1.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.15 27.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.811 38.664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3300

Compare specifications (specs)