AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1833 vs 1577
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 410
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8493 vs 3883
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.479 vs 14.283
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 386.006
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 1.018
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 15.605
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 31.155
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 2646
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3339
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 2646
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 1623
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 1623

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1577
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 410
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8493 3883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.479 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	575.773 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.902 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.15 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.811 31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3339

Compare specifications (specs)