AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition und NVIDIA Quadro K3000M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 19% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:775 MHz vs 654 MHz
- Etwa 2% höhere Texturfüllrate: 32 GTexel / s vs 31.39 GTexel / s
- Etwa 11% höhere Leitungssysteme: 640 vs 576
- Etwa 36% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,024 gflops vs 753.4 gflops
- Etwa 61% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 4500 MHz vs 2800 MHz
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 341
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9697 vs 4252
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.151 vs 14.45
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 516.994 vs 403.983
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 vs 0.992
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 vs 15.202
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 vs 24.266
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2527
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2527
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 5 May 2015 vs 1 June 2012 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 775 MHz vs 654 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 32 GTexel / s vs 31.39 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 640 vs 576 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,024 gflops vs 753.4 gflops |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 4500 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 vs 341 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9697 vs 4252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 vs 14.45 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 vs 403.983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 vs 0.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 vs 15.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 vs 24.266 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 vs 2527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 2527 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1652 vs 1541
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 1667
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3326
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 1667
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3326
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1652 vs 1541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3326 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1541 | 1652 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 341 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9697 | 4252 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | 14.45 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | 403.983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | 0.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | 15.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | 24.266 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 2527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | 3505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 2527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | 3505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 | 3353 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Codename | Tropo | GK104 |
Startdatum | 5 May 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1020 | 1007 |
Typ | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $155 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $155 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 13.57 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 800 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 775 MHz | 654 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,024 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 640 | 576 |
Texturfüllrate | 32 GTexel / s | 31.39 GTexel / s |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 72 GB / s | 89.6 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 4500 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 |