AMD Radeon R9 M375X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 732 MHz
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 29 November 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 448 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1280 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 1,299 gflops
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 3548
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 3548
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2133 vs 1333
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2133 vs 1333
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2185
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops vs 1,299 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 vs 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 vs 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 2185 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1808 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 | 4590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 | 4590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8203 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2185 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2185 | 3333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M375X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | GF110 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 29 November 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 877 | 879 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | 1,311.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | 41.0 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M375X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
ATIMobility Radeon X300
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
AMDRadeon 540
